Institutional FOMO Syndrome: AI-Based Digital Asset Valuation on Banking Asset Quality and Risk Disclosure

Authors

  • Adib Minanurohman Institut Keuangan-Perbankan Dan Informatika Asia Perbanas
  • Nurul Fitriani Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Yulianti Raharjo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56456/jebdeker.v6i2.955

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Institutional FOMO Syndrome, Banking Asset Quality, Risk Disclosure

Abstract

The global financial transformation triggered by the convergence of digital assets and artificial intelligence (AI) has given rise to the phenomenon of Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) syndrome among banking institutions. These hasty portfolio integration decisions create fundamental challenges for conventional accounting reporting, particularly regarding instrument valuation and risk measurement. This study aims to analyze the impact of adopting digital assets valued using AI on banking asset quality metrics, as well as to evaluate the gaps in the current risk disclosure framework. Utilizing a library research method with a descriptive-critical qualitative approach, this study synthesizes various academic literature, accounting regulatory standards, and industry risk profile reports. The analysis results indicate that the prioritization of crypto assets creates an illusion of liquidity that can instantaneously erode banking asset quality due to extreme market volatility. Furthermore, the use of AI as a valuation instrument (black-box) carries the risk of failing to anticipate market anomalies such as flash crashes, leading to fair value distortions in the balance sheet. In conclusion, the adoption of AI-based digital assets without being balanced by updates to accounting standards triggers systemic vulnerability and information asymmetry. Therefore, it is recommended that regulators and accounting standard boards intervene to formulate AI algorithm audit guidelines, more specific crypto asset classifications, and mandatory narrative and qualitative risk disclosures to maintain the transparency of banking financial reporting.

References

Al-Okaily, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and its applications in the context of accounting and disclosure. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(4), 1387–1401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2024-0209

Bahanan, M., Qastalano, R. I., & Sa’adah, H. (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Memitigasi Risiko Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, Bisnis Digital, Ekonomi Kreatif, Entrepreneur (JEBDEKER), 5(2), 354–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56456/jebdeker.v5i2.831

Bei, D. (2025). Pengaruh Risiko Kredit Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan ( Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Bank Yang Terdaftar. 31–40.

Biswas, S., Carson, B., Chung, V., Singh, S., & Thomas, R. (2020). AI-bank of the future: Can banks meet the AI challenge. New York: McKinsey & Company, 28.

Cai, J. (2022). Bank herding and systemic risk. Economic Systems, 46(4), 101042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2022.101042

Chaisiripaibool, S., Kraiwanit, T., Rafiyya, A., Snongtaweeporn, T., & Yuenyong, N. (2025). Digital Asset Adoption in Developing Economy: A Study of Risk Perception and Related Issues. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 15(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv15i1p4

Financial Accounting Standard Board (2024). Accounting Standards Update (ASU) intangibles—goodwill and other—crypto assets (Subtopic 350-60).

Fritz-Morgenthal, S., Hein, B., & Papenbrock, J. (2022). Financial risk management and explainable, trustworthy, responsible AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 779799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.779799

Gerrans, P., Abisekaraj, S. B., & Liu, Z. F. (2023). The fear of missing out on cryptocurrency and stock investments: Direct and indirect effects of financial literacy and risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing, 1(1), 103–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/flw.2023.6

Giner, B., Allini, A., & Zampella, A. (2020). The value relevance of risk disclosure: An analysis of the banking sector. Accounting in Europe, 17(2), 129–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2020.1730921

Hacibedel, M. B., & Perez-Saiz, H. (2023). Assessing macrofinancial risks from crypto assets. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400255083.001

Haykir, O., & Yagli, I. (2022). Speculative bubbles and herding in cryptocurrencies. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00383-0

Ikhsan, R. B., Fernando, Y., Prabowo, H., Gui, A., & Kuncoro, E. A. (2026). Corrigendum to ‘An empirical study on the use of artificial intelligence in the banking sector of Indonesia by extending the TAM model and the moderating effect of perceived trust’[Digital Business 5 (2025) 100103]. Digital Business, 100169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2026.100169

Klopper, N., & Brink, S. M. (2023). Determining the appropriate accounting treatment of cryptocurrencies based on accounting theory. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(9), 379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16090379

Laraga, A. G. (2025). Understanding the" Fear of Missing Out"(FOMO) Phenomenon Among Retail Investors in the Indonesian Capital Market: A Literature Review. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 10(2), 310–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v10i2.10625

Lukmansyah, W. (2026). Praktik Kesejahteraan Terintegrasi dalam Manajemen SDM: A Systematic Literature Review tentang Pengaruhnya terhadap Kesejahteraan Karyawan dan Kinerja Organisasi di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 7170–7190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.5438

Mahieux, L. (2023). Fair value accounting, illiquid assets, and financial stability. Management Science, 70(1), 544–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4692

Mateo-Casali, M. A., Boza, A., & Fraile, F. (2025). Digital assets in zero-defect manufacturing: literature review and proposed framework. International Journal of Production Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2025.2563746

Paramita, A. W., Hudzafidah, K., & Wilamsari, F. (2025). Pengaruh FOMO , Aspek Fundamental , dan Aspek Teknikal Pada Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi Generasi Z. 7(3). https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v7i3.3099

Peng, Y., Ahmad, S. F., Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., Al Shaikh, M. S., Daoud, M. K., & Alhamdi, F. M. H. (2023). Riding the waves of artificial intelligence in advancing accounting and its implications for sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 15(19), 14165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914165

Prasad, K. D. V, Shyamsunder, C., Soni, H., & Srinivas, V. (2025). Cryptocurrency investment adoption intentions of indian investors: Mediating and moderating effects of fear of missing out (fomo): A gen z and millennials prospective. Vision, 09722629251326762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629251326762

Ram, A. P., & Arulmurugan, V. (2026). Cryptocurrency Adoption and Investment Intensity in Fintech: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. NMIMS Management Review, 09711023261432771. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023261432771

Sari, M. N., Susmita, N., & Ikhlas, A. (2025). Melakukan penelitian kepustakaan. Pradina Pustaka.

Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704

Song, F., Graupensperger, S., Lostutter, T. W., & Larimer, M. E. (2024). Fear of missing out on financial gains: associations between fear of missing out, problem gambling, and speculative trading in college students. Emerging Adulthood, 12(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696824123802

Stupak, V. (2025). Economic Risk and Cryptocurrency: What Drives Global Digital Asset Adoption? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080453

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syauqi, M. R. A., Nurfauji, B. B., Saputra, H. H., Zuriyah, Y., & Priatna, T. (2026). A Study of Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Data Analysis Techniques in Indonesian National Journal Articles: Systematic Literature Review. INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 3(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61166/interdisiplin.v3i1.144

Toerien, F. E., & Du Toit, E. (2024). Fighting through the Flesch and Fog: the readability of risk disclosures. Accounting Research Journal, 37(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-03-2023-0094

Tri, N., Telaumbanua, A., Tambunan, A. J., Gultom, E. G., Lumbantoruan, M., Panggabean, M. N., Maria, H., & Putri, G. (2025). Economics and Digital Business Review. 6(2).

Wardhana, C. S. (2024). Eksplorasi Fundamental Cryptocurrency dalam Volatilitas Harga. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(4), 1040–1053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i4.1094

Yousaf, I., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). Herding behavior in conventional cryptocurrency market, non-fungible tokens, and DeFi assets. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103299

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles